9

Ghid "Utilizarea Calculatorului si a Serviciilor Electronice"
(9.05.2005)

eCampania
(20.01.2005)

Ghid pentru combaterea cybercrime
(30.09.2004)

Parlament.RO
(27.05.2004)

Parlamentul Roman vs. Europa
(19.04.2004)

@Parlament
(19.02.2004)

Un click pentru Constitutie
(14.10.2003)

Interviu: acordul MCTI-Microsoft
(02.10.2003)

Open Source
(14.07.2003)

e-Casuta Deputatilor
(30.04.2003)

 

CDep.ro &  Senat.ro websites   Parliament.RO
Sorin Kertesz, Adela Danciu, Razvan Lefter, Gabriela Chita, Ramona Ristea, Diana Jianu
16 June 2004
Full report (.pdf, 261Kb)

With frequent Internet users at 20% of Romania's population, the web becomes an important communication channel for public institutions. Among them, the Parliament, as a representative institution of the citizens, must be open to the innovations facilitating its connection with the population.

Our study aims to identify the issues that require further developments, as well as the successful solutions and applications. It focuses on the essential aspects for providing citizens with easier access to information and for making the legislative process and parliamentary procedures more transparent. The main topics of the analysis are:

  • the structure and the content of information available online
  • accessibility
  • interaction with users

Findings

The analysis finds that the websites of the two chambers focus mostly on presenting information (providing most essential information), while overlooking accessibility and bi-directional communication with citizens.

In the absence of other interactive functions, the main communication mean available to citizens is the email. However, only some 27% of the 485 Romanian MPs have email addresses - far below the minimum in EU member states (46%).

32 of the 42 counties represented in the Senate don't have any senator with an email address. Nevertheless, even if some MPs have an email address, this doesn't guarantee their dialogue with the citizen: only 9% of the inquiries sent via email receive an answer from parliamentarians.

The comparison with European websites confirms the conclusions of the survey - the Romanian websites do well in providing information, but they drop to the bottom half of the table when it comes to interactivity and accessibility.

Conclusions and recommendations

Thus, the Romanian Parliament presents a wide range of information online, but in terms of interactivity, the MPs grant little importance to the dialogue with their constituents.

Based on the analysis, the report presents several recommendations for the websites of the two chambers, as follows:

  • Interaction - providing online communication tools (both for MPs and for the site users);
  • Transparency - publishing relevant and accessible information to allow the public to monitor MPs' activity;
  • Accountability - publishing the lists with MPs' attendance of meetings and the vote expressed by them (provided the vote was open);
  • Monitoring - personal record of given awards or disciplinary sanctions or other relevant information (i.e.: requests for parliamentary immunity cancellation);
  • Budget - direct access to specific annual laws (especially in the chapter about the institution).

Publishing such information online would lead not only to increased accountability of the MPs, but would also strengthen citizens' trust in the institution that represents them.

 

 

Copyright eDemocratie.ro 2001-2003
Despre noi  |  Declaratii de presa  |  Termeni de utilizare  |  Politica de confidentialitate  |  Contact